"Far From Normal"
My new novel of the post-oil future, World Made By Hand, is available at all booksellers.
____________________________________
Those were the words that Fed chairman Ben Bernanke used to describe the financial markets (and by extension the economy) these heady spring days when everybody else with a rostrum, it seems, has pronounced the so-called liquidity crisis contained. There's a great wish for American finance to return to business-as-usual -- raking in fantastic fees for innovating new modes of tradable paper, and engineering mergers and buy-outs that generate huge fees plus $100 million kiss-offs for corporate CEOs in the noble struggle to dismantle America's productive capacity -- but apparently events are still out of hand.
The
Federal Reserve itself has been instrumental in promoting abnormality
by doing everything possible to prevent the work-out of bad debts in
the system. Since money is loaned into existence, and loans are debts,
the work-out of bad debt suggests the discovery that a lot of money has
disappeared -- which is exactly the case. The Fed has postponed the
work-out by sucking up truckloads of impaired, untradable securities in
exchange for loans to giant banks who don't have enough cash on hand to
pay their janitors.
Personally, my theory has been that the specter of peak oil pretty
clearly implies the inability of industrial economies to continue
producing real wealth in the customary way. In the face of this, either
consciously or at a more mystical level, the worker bees in banking
recognize that, in order to maintain their villas in the Hamptons,
money has to be loaned into existence some other way (than in the
service of industrial productivity).
We've tried just about everything else. There was the so-called
service economy, an attempt to replace manufacturing with hamburger
sales. Then there was the information economy, in which work would be
replaced with knowing about stuff. Then there was the tech thing, which
was about bringing internet companies that existed only on the back of
cocktail napkins to the initial public offering stage of capitalization
-- which allowed a few-hundred-or-so thirty-year-old smoothies to
retire to vineyards in the Napa Valley, while hundreds of thousands of
retirees lost half the value of their investment portfolios. Then
there was the housing boom, which was all about the creation of more
suburban sprawl under the theory that houses (or "homes" in the jargon
of the realtors) represent an obvious sort of wealth, and therefore
that using houses as collateral would allow humongous sums of money to
be loaned into existence -- along with massive fees for structuring the
loans into bundles of bond-like thingies.
This has all failed now because the racket went too far. Every
possible candidate for a snookering got snookered. Too much collateral
for which there were no takers went into the ground. The insane run-up
in house values made a downward price movement inevitable, and as soon
as the turnaround happened, it fell into the remorseless algebra of a
deflationary death spiral. More importantly, however, this society ran
out of tricks for loaning money into existence and instead began to
experience the pain of money thought-to-be-in-existence being defaulted
into a vapor -- and worse, these defaults led to logarithmic chains of
money destruction in its places of origin, the investment banks that
had created the racket.
The important part of this is that the money is gone. What makes
matters truly eerie is that the "bubble" in suburban houses has
occurred at exactly the moment in history when the chief enabling
resource for suburban life -- oil -- has entered its scarcity stage.
The logical conclusion of all this is not what the American public wants to hear:
we have become a much poorer society and are now faced with the
unavoidable task of making major changes in how we live. All the
three-card-monte moves at the highest level of finance lately amount to
an effort to avoid the unavoidable, acknowledging our losses. Certainly
the political fallout of all this will be awesome. But it's not about
politics, really. It's about the entire society's inability to form a
workable new consensus of reality.
It's hard to predict how long these institutions at the heart of
our economic system can linger in the "far from normal" limbo of
pretending that money has not been defaulted out of existence. Since
the same process is underway in Great Britain and Spain, places beyond
the control of Bernanke, Secretary Paulson, and the Boyz on Wall
Street, and since actions and reactions there will affect the destiny
of money here, its hard to escape the conclusion that we're at most
months away from the brutal recognition that Wall Street has managed to
bankrupt itself (and, by extension, the United States). This is dark
heart of the matter of which no one dares speak.
Meantime, on the ground, every mook and minion in the land sees
the gas pumps levitate beyond the $4 hash mark, and notes with
bugged-out eyes the double-digit price stickers on common supermarket
items, and feels the rush of blood from the extremities when some
check-out clerk at the WalMart declares that a certain proffered credit
card is maxed out, and some strangers in overalls -- the neighbors say
-- managed to hot-wire the GMC Sierra in the driveway, and took it
away....
The candidates for president will have a lot to talk about. I wonder if they'll dare to.
Out of Brain on the 5:15
Inside Outside Leave Me Alone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tffF-AEkdE
Posted by: Johnny Rico | May 20, 2008 at 04:40 AM
JR, p. 162. Did you find the quote you were looking for?
Let me try another random sampling: “It was the guards’ firmly expressed wish that every American without an overcoat should take one. The coats were cemented together with ice, so the guards used their bayonets as ice picks, pricking free collars and hems and sleeves and so on, then peeling them off and handing them out at random.” Slaughterhouse Five, p. 103.
What are the odds of me finding two quotes, from successive first random samplings of two different (arguably randomly selected) books, that both include the word “random”? (This has earned me a beer, I declare… as does having a pulse and being sufficiently ambulatory still to go get one.)
UR and dave, belated thanks for your thoughts regarding AG from the prior thread.
The Chinese do indeed have a long history with silver.
Links to information about Chinese sycee…
http://www.charm.ru/library/syceelist.htm
Of numismatic interest…
http://www.charm.ru/library/sycee2.htm
Posted by: Holmes, I presume | May 20, 2008 at 04:47 AM
Summertime Blues
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-kJONgWKFi0
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 04:48 AM
The fact that logic cannot satisfy us awakens an almost insatiable hunger for the irrational.
A. N. Wilson
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 05:00 AM
America, which has the most glorious present still existing in the world today, hardly stops to enjoy it, in her insatiable appetite for the future.
Anne Morrow Lindbergh
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 05:01 AM
au revoir, mon ami
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 05:03 AM
Cool. I finally re-found the doomer comments thread on TOD. Here's the link: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4013#comments_top
Happy reading! Bon nuit!
Posted by: Dr.Doom | May 20, 2008 at 05:07 AM
Big Failure:
Ian MacKaye
Mogambu Guru? Dude is an ode to his own failureness everytime he writes. Who's he kidding. He's better than Tom Kloza, I guess.
Mogambu Guru is seriously retarded. When was the last good stock tip you got offa him?
The funny thing is somebody actually pays him over 50 gees(jeez) to write that retarded shit.
I mean, right? Or more. Ask Mogambu Retard what he makes and Who pays him.
I will bet money nobody will answer either of those questions.
What does RETARD do? That my Mom can't do?
(Besides make awesome Mexican dishes, duh)
Posted by: Johnny Rico | May 20, 2008 at 05:09 AM
I'm reading The Black Swan too...
i've read the prologue and am now on page 6 of Chapter One,The Apprenticeship of an Empirical Skeptic.
Posted by: OGH | May 20, 2008 at 05:31 AM
Good morning all. The march o' pennies continues upward, with regular unleaded being $3.800 and diesel being $4.539. That diesel price is up 1.7c daily and up 55.7% YOY.
EE, thanks for the NPR link. Priceless! :)
Mmm .. nice to know there are others out there seeing the same thing ..
“GM and gas wars .. 'we're as well-positioned as anybody' ”
http://info.detnews.com/redesign/blogs/danielhowesblog/index.cfm
So says the General top sales analyst, who in one sweeping statement essentially confirms what General Motors Corp.'s critics -- including my Toyota Prius-loving father-in-law -- have been saying for years: Detroit is fixated on its big pickups and SUVs, even as it has vastly improved its cars, their designs and their fuel-efficiency.
"We've been promoting our trucks more than we should have," Mike DiGiovanni, GM's top sales analyst, told a conference in Warren. "We're going to shift our marketing toward fuel economy and hybrids."
Sheer genius, as a reader, Gary S., pointed out to me today: "Oh, so now GM is figuring out that gas prices might affect truck sales? I'm just this middle class small-town guy, no genius by anyone's account, and I kinda sorta figured out -- oh, maybe three years ago or two years ago? -- like everybody else (except apparently the execs at GM) that energy prices were heading up and up, and smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles would be in demand."
Would make you want to weep if it wasn't so infuriating because Mickey D., as he's known to his friends, has it right: GM is well-positioned. It just prefers to cede the fuel-economy high ground to Toyota. Why is beyond me.
Here's a company that has spent the better part of 15 years playing catch-up to the standard in its industry (that would be Toyota). It has watched the Prius hybrid become a synonym for market savvy and anticipation. It has gutted through global restructuring after global restructuring, labor contract after labor contract. And, still, it doesn't acknowledge the reality of wrought by higher gas prices? Still, it has trouble telling its story?
What $4-a-gallon gas and the knowledge that a goodly chunk of every fuel dollar goes to support the likes of Hugo Chavez, Vladimir Putin and Iran's mullahs doesn't change, then peer pressure and the changing needs (and tastes) of aging baby boomers will. The trends have been obvious at least since 9-11, and have accelerated in the past couple of years.
That GM is acknowleging it now -- in a news story that runs the day its newest critic, probable Democratic nominee Barack Obama, is in Michigan for the first time in 10 months -- tells you why the General (and Detroit's other two companies) keep finding themselves in deep holes. They don't know when to stop digging.
--
In the parlance of today, it seems that GM's admittedly limited capacity for improvement has been “successfully contained”.
Posted by: Nudge | May 20, 2008 at 05:40 AM
Holmes, OGH, EEofDC, who else?
Jesus.
Black Swan Nation.
Nice.
Posted by: Johnny Rico | May 20, 2008 at 06:06 AM
«The only problem with stopping the spending on Iraq, is that we are/were spending on credit. Just as with rebuilding NOLA, show me another trillion that we can use to spend on rebuilding our transportation system.»
The difference is, this is an *investment*. I'm sure FDR's opponents wailed and gnashed their teeth about how the country couldn't afford the New Deal, but the WPA and various other agencies gave people useful work & left the US with infrastructure that's still in use to this day. Float bonds to pay for it, maybe, if anyone's still buying our paper.
«Don't forget the chickens»
Good point, Roachman. As I've said before, factory-style chicken farms are not going to be viable for much longer. You gotta get that chicken on the table *somehow*.
JR, the [q]cha cha[/q] thing is, I believe, quote markup for PHPBB, popular software for online forums.
«GM's top sales analyst [said] "We're going to shift our marketing toward fuel economy and hybrids."»
Did you catch that, folks? They're going to shift their *marketing*. Not their products, or even their product mix. They're going to make a lot of noise about how fuel-efficient they are (honest!) and sell the same ol' pigs.
You can always count on a big corporation for loopy thinking.
Posted by: FARfetched | May 20, 2008 at 08:34 AM
There seems to a lot o confusion about how much crude oil pricing affects gasoline prices in the US.
Similarly, there is very little effort by the media to alert or otherwise inform the US driving public that US gasoline refinery capacity is the main relevant factor with respect to current gasoline consumption/costs.
Refinery capacity hasn't tracked US consumption for at least 5 years. Imported gasoline market/futures is what drives current gasoline costs/pricing.
Posted by: bud4wiser | May 20, 2008 at 08:44 AM
scott,
like i said before, good call on synm. thanks.
dave
Posted by: Dave | May 20, 2008 at 09:01 AM
I get that it's an investment, but when you've maxed your Visa on vacations in the Middle East coming up with fodder for the fatherland is more difficult. In my mind it becomes about driving down labor costs, and who doesn't work for food, to the point that people will build that damn in the Arizona heat, no matter how many become the damn.
It would cost a trillion to make NOLA the Netherlands, which is what will be required in another six inches of cool crisp glacial water by the half liter. God, I saw 4oz. bottles of water not too long ago! I felt like a whore drinking them...
As my grandfather worked for Tucker, my feelings for Motown are lacking. And, people like Lutz make me head hurt. That's why I drive (drove) those vehicles made by crafty little German trolls. Except my grandfather's '70 Coupe de Ville was quite the car for entertaining!
Sorry Rico, I love Quadrophenia, and may put it on right now, but Floyd? I can't. I just can't...
Posted by: Nicholas Paredes | May 20, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Lovelock the hippy, now thats funny.
He is boring because but that is the only type of scientist NASA ever hired back in the 60s thus we have NASA to thanks for Gaia.
Read the Gaia book back in 1990 and would need to pull out math books to wake myself up.
Posted by: theroachman1 | May 20, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Gasoline $1.25 per litre in Southern Ontario. CND surpassed USD yesterday yet again.
Posted by: Brandon | May 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM
"Mogambu Guru is seriously retarded. When was the last good stock tip you got offa him?"
Sweet Jeebus Rico. I don't read the guy for f'ing stock tips.
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 11:39 AM
D3PO,
Thanks for the TOD doomer thread link.
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Yeah, really. Whether or not I invest in PM's I would never take a stock tip from Mogambo. Mogambo Guru is really a relationship advice column and since I've started reading a few years ago I've really learned how to sweet talk all the ladies.
Posted by: Rudi | May 20, 2008 at 11:59 AM
up. Relationship guru Mogambo Guru. So true I never knew that shouting abusive swearing meaningless tirades at the top of my lungs would get the chicks so crazy for me.
Posted by: theroachman1 | May 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Check the news. Gold up. Silver up. Oil pushing towards $130. Dollar down. Stock Market down. Asian Markets and Australian markets Down.
Articles like this:
Megabubble waiting for new president in 2009
'Numbers racket' exposes potential disaster for economy, markets
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/governments-numbers-racket-about-blow/story.aspx?guid=%7BF91A0843%2D69B4%2D4C0C%2D92CE%2DB835D9907945%7D&dist=TNMostRead
Is this what that guy in Apocalypse Now meant when he said "God I love the smell of napalm in the morning"?
Posted by: Movenonup | May 20, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Kilgore: Smell that? You smell that?
Lance: What?
Kilgore: Napalm, son. Nothing in the world smells like that.
[kneels]
Kilgore: I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end...
[Kilgore unhappily walks off]
Posted by: LaughingAsRomeWasBurningDown | May 20, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Just discovered Jim's blog. Seems very clued up about many things. Who, exactly, are the 'Boyz' in the band? (band of thieves, I assume?)
What happens to gas prices when we're in the middle of the next Depression? (about a year from now). What are the Boyz in Brazil gonna do with all that oil they just discovered? What about all those Canadian tar sands? Who will be driving to work when there is no work? Horses might just catch on - they're so environmental! ;)
Let's be optimistic!
Posted by: EternalOptimist | May 20, 2008 at 01:05 PM
scorched economy
Posted by: Uncle Remus | May 20, 2008 at 01:07 PM